3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>

commit 24e9a47e14f0a97ee97abc3dd86b2ef254448a17 upstream.

Dynamic static allocation is evil, as Kernel stack is too low, and
compilation complains about it on some archs:
        drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c:238:1: warning: 
'v4l2_async_notifier_unregister' uses dynamic stack allocation [enabled by 
default]
Instead, let's enforce a limit for the buffer.
In this specific case, there's a hard limit imposed by V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS,
with is currently 128. That means that the buffer size can be up to
128x8 = 1024 bytes (on a 64bits kernel), with is too big for stack.
Worse than that, someone could increase it and cause real troubles.
So, let's use dynamically allocated data, instead.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
+++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-async.c
@@ -189,30 +189,53 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(stru
        struct v4l2_subdev *sd, *tmp;
        unsigned int notif_n_subdev = notifier->num_subdevs;
        unsigned int n_subdev = min(notif_n_subdev, V4L2_MAX_SUBDEVS);
-       struct device *dev[n_subdev];
+       struct device **dev;
        int i = 0;
 
        if (!notifier->v4l2_dev)
                return;
 
+       dev = kmalloc(n_subdev * sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!dev) {
+               dev_err(notifier->v4l2_dev->dev,
+                       "Failed to allocate device cache!\n");
+       }
+
        mutex_lock(&list_lock);
 
        list_del(&notifier->list);
 
        list_for_each_entry_safe(sd, tmp, &notifier->done, async_list) {
-               dev[i] = get_device(sd->dev);
+               struct device *d;
+
+               d = get_device(sd->dev);
 
                v4l2_async_cleanup(sd);
 
                /* If we handled USB devices, we'd have to lock the parent too 
*/
-               device_release_driver(dev[i++]);
+               device_release_driver(d);
 
                if (notifier->unbind)
                        notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, sd->asd);
+
+               /*
+                * Store device at the device cache, in order to call
+                * put_device() on the final step
+                */
+               if (dev)
+                       dev[i++] = d;
+               else
+                       put_device(d);
        }
 
        mutex_unlock(&list_lock);
 
+       /*
+        * Call device_attach() to reprobe devices
+        *
+        * NOTE: If dev allocation fails, i is 0, and the whole loop won't be
+        * executed.
+        */
        while (i--) {
                struct device *d = dev[i];
 
@@ -228,6 +251,7 @@ void v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(stru
                }
                put_device(d);
        }
+       kfree(dev);
 
        notifier->v4l2_dev = NULL;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to