> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 10:01 AM
> To: Zheng, Lv
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko; Wysocki, Rafael J; [email protected]; LKML
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] SFI: fix compilation warnings
> 
> On Friday, December 06, 2013 01:26:07 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 9:26 AM
> > >
> > > On Friday, December 06, 2013 01:08:45 AM Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 6:37 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday, December 05, 2013 07:26:37 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > When build kernel with make W=1 we get the following compiler error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In file included from drivers/sfi/sfi_acpi.c:66:0:
> > > > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h: In function ‘acpi_sfi_table_parse’:
> > > > > > include/linux/sfi_acpi.h:72:2: error: implicit declaration of 
> > > > > > function ‘acpi_table_parse’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > > >   if (!acpi_table_parse(signature, handler))
> > > > > >   ^
> > > > > >   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The patch changes acpi/acpi.h inclusion to linux/acpi.h.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> > > > >
> > > > > OK
> > > > >
> > > > > Lv, I'm dropping your patch cleaning up the inclusions, please sort 
> > > > > that thing
> > > > > out entirely for the next cycle.
> > > >
> > > > No, I think Andy's patch is wrong.
> > >
> > > His patch may be wrong, but the warning in his changelog surely is real. 
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > > This warning is existing before merging my fixes.
> > > >
> > > > Either we fix this warning or leave it as is.
> > > >
> > > > To fix it, you need to add 1 line in sfi_acpi.h rather than change the 
> > > > line.
> > > > Let me post a fix for this.
> > >
> > > Please do.  And I'm putting all ACPI header cleanups on hold until all 
> > > warnings
> > > of this kind have been fixed by them.  Otherwise doing those cleanups 
> > > makes a
> > > little sense in my opinion.
> >
> > OK, not only this warning, there is another warning in sfi_acpi.c.
> > I doubt whether they are strictly tested before upstreamed...
> > They are all existing warnings.
> > You can apply my new patch before the cleanup series.
> 
> Sorry, I'm already lost in the thick of patches. :-)
> 
> Please resend them all as a single series.

OK, I'll sort them again.

Thanks
-Lv

> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to