On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:27:43PM +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:15:28PM +1100, Peter Williams wrote: > > > >>Perhaps the logical solution is to implement debugfs in terms of relayfs? > > > > > >What do you mean by this statement? > > I mean that if, as you say, debugfs is very similar to relayfs only more > restricted (i.e. a debugging option) then it should be implementable as > an instance or specialization of the more general relayfs and that this > should be a better solution than two independent implementations of > similar functionality.
Ah. No. The implementations are not of the same functionality, or so Karim says. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
