On 12/10/2013 05:07 PM, [email protected] wrote:
From: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>

The read_sched_clock should return the ~value because the clock is a
countdown implementation. read_sched_clock() should be the same as
  __apbt_read_clocksource().

Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <[email protected]>
---
v5: Split up into 2 patches
v4: Simplify the fix by simply returning ~__raw_readl(sched_io_base)
v3: Use APBTMR_N_CURRENT_VALUE define in read_sched_clock()
v2: Maintain backwards compatibility for "dw-apb-timer-sp" and
       "dw-apb-timer-osc".
---
  drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c 
b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c
index 45ba8ae..b29d7cd 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void __init add_clocksource(struct device_node 
*source_timer)

  static u64 read_sched_clock(void)
  {
-       return __raw_readl(sched_io_base);
+       return ~__raw_readl(sched_io_base);
  }

Dinh,

I dropped the patch moving the macro definitions as it is not applied for urgent and I assume it is not needed for the 3.14 as there are no more patches depending on it.

  -- Daniel

  static const struct of_device_id sptimer_ids[] __initconst = {



--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to