I still believe (assuming Josh says it tests ok) that a revert is a
reasonable fix until next window.  But I might know the actual problem:

Lets assume policy says:
   fuse.gluster == use_xattr

Lets assume this function is called with
sb->s_type->name == fuse
sb->s_subtype == NULL

int security_fs_use(struct super_block *sb)
{
        int rc = 0;
        struct ocontext *c;
        struct superblock_security_struct *sbsec = sb->s_security;
        const char *fstype = sb->s_type->name;
        const char *subtype = (sb->s_subtype && sb->s_subtype[0]) ? 
sb->s_subtype : NULL;
        struct ocontext *base = NULL;

        read_lock(&policy_rwlock);

        for (c = policydb.ocontexts[OCON_FSUSE]; c; c = c->next) {
                char *sub;
                int baselen;

                baselen = strlen(fstype);

                **********  assume c == the above rule   name = fuse.gluster

                /* if base does not match, this is not the one */
                if (strncmp(fstype, c->u.name, baselen))    <----------- this 
will match
                        continue;

                /* if there is no subtype, this is the one! */
                if (!subtype)   <--------------------------------------- we 
will break here!
                        break;
[snip]
        }
[snip]
        if (c) {
                sbsec->behavior = c->v.behavior;

So we just matched on the fuse.gluster rule even though the mount in
question was fstype=fuse subtype=NULL     So we will try to use xattrs
on a fuse FS that can/will deadlock.

I'll try to write a patch to fix that logic...

-Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to