On Sunday 23 January 2005 06:32, Matt Mackall wrote: > Yes, indeed. Though I think even here, we'd prefer to use kmalloc > because gcc generates suboptimal code for variable-sized stack vars.
That's ridiculous. kmalloc isn't even close to whatever suboptimal code gcc might produce here. Also I'm not convinced that gcc generates bad code in the first place. The code I get makes perfect sense. -- Andreas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/