Hi, On 12/17/2013 01:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hai.. > > This is my current queue of SCHED_DEADLINE; which I hope to merge 'soon'. > > Juri handed me a version that should've (didn't check) included all feedback > including the new sched_attr interface. > > I did clean up some of the patches; moved some hunks around so that each patch > compiles on its own etc.. > > I then did a number of patches at the end to change some actual stuff around. > > Juri do you have some userspace around to test with? I'm just too likely to > have wrecked everything; so if you don't have something I need to go write > something before merging this :-) > > No need to update your test proglets to the new interface, I can lift it if > that is more convenient -- I know you're conferencing atm. >
I use this: https://github.com/gbagnoli/rt-app/tree/new-ABI It is aligned with the new ABI (but it is missing your last changes). > One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that > patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio > and Michael in some other way? > We could change their SoB to be a Cc (not sure this cure the thing anyway). Not even Cc-ing them seems pointless. Then we have them mentioned in sched/deadline.c copyright (oh! s/2012/2014/ there :-O). Thanks, - Juri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
