Add some nitpicks below.

Reviewed-by: Chen, Gong <[email protected]>

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:47:24PM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> +int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
> +{
> +     int irq, cpu;
> +     unsigned int vector, this_count, count;
> +     struct irq_desc *desc;
> +     struct irq_data *data;
> +     struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
> +
> +     cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
> +     cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), online_new);
I notice that you use smp_processor_id() many times. Maybe we can
save it first for speed.

> +
> +     this_count = 0;
> +     for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
> +             irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
> +             if (irq >= 0) {
> +                     desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +                     data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> +                     cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
> +                     cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), affinity_new);
> +                     /*
> +                      * Only count active non-percpu irqs, and those
> +                      * irqs that are not linked to on an online cpu; in
> +                      * fixup_irqs(), chip->irq_set_affinity() will be
> +                      * called which will set vector_irq[irq] for each
> +                      * cpu.
> +                      */
> +                     if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) &&
> +                         (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
> +                          !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new)))
> +                             this_count++;
Would you please add some extra comments to describe these two different
conditions that cpumask is empty and non-empty. I feel it is a little bit
sutble and I don't expect I'm confused by myself one day :-).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to