Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 23:00 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Is this really necessary?
> > No problem. %pT[012] are simply optimization (reducing number of function
> > arguments for saving text size) and therefore I can drop them.
> > What about below patch?
>
> Hi Tetsuo. Just a nit.
>
> > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
> []
> > @@ -1232,7 +1248,7 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end,
> > void *ptr,
> > {
> > int default_width = 2 * sizeof(void *) + (spec.flags & SPECIAL ? 2 : 0);
> >
> > - if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K') {
> > + if (!ptr && *fmt != 'K' && *fmt != 'T') {
>
> I think this new 'T' comparison isn't necessary.
This is needed for allowing comm_name() to accept NULL instead of current.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
