On 2014/1/8 10:50, Bing Zhao wrote:
> Hi Ding,
>
>> Use possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal
>> instead of memcmp.
>
>> @@ -782,8 +782,7 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_ibss_coalescing_status(struct
>> mwifiex_private *priv,
>> }
>>
>> /* If BSSID is diff, modify current BSS parameters */
>> - if (memcmp(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address,
>> - ibss_coal_resp->bssid, ETH_ALEN)) {
>> + if (!ether_addr_equal(priv->curr_bss_params.bss_descriptor.mac_address,
>> ibss_coal_resp->bssid))
>
> Could you break the line?
> If you run "checkpatch.pl" you will spot this warning.
>
>> if (!IS_11N_ENABLED(priv) ||
>> - memcmp(priv->curr_addr, rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest, ETH_ALEN)) {
>> + !ether_addr_equal_unaligned(priv->curr_addr,
>> rx_pkt_hdr->eth803_hdr.h_dest)) {
>
> Also over 80 characters here.
>
> Thanks,
> Bing
>
Ok, thanks
Regards
Ding
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
