On 3 January 2014 17:53, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 18:19 +0200, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: >> From: Ben Dooks <[email protected]> >> >> Ensure we read instructions in the correct endian-ness by using >> the <asm/opcodes.h> helper to transform them as necessary. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <[email protected]> >> [[email protected]: fix next_instruction() function] >> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <[email protected]> >> --- > > Apart from the spurious line removal (see below) then: > > Acked-by: Jon Medhurst <[email protected]> > > and you can include an ACK for the other patches in this series too. > > Thanks.
>> @@ -1593,7 +1594,6 @@ static int run_test_cases(void (*tests)(void), const >> union decode_item *table) >> return 0; >> } >> >> - > > I know the above blank line isn't needed but I believe the convention is > to avoid doing unrelated white-space clean-ups in patches. Right, I will remove it. Should this series go through Russell's patch tracking system or it can be pulled to some tree? -- Regards, Taras Kondratiuk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
