On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:14:07AM -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Matuschek <[email protected]> wrote:
Daniel, please take more care with the CC lists when posting things - there's nothing to do with device tree in this patch but you've CCed the DT list and some DT people wich means more noise in their mailbox. > Why does it need to be an option? If 256x is better, then why not > always use it? Maybe the code to select the divisor should be better? It's typically a power/performance tradeoff, though for this part I can't see anyone caring about power. > Since it stops at the first divisor that works, won't it always use > mclkdiv=1? If mclkdiv=0 is better, why not just list those first/only > in the table so they get used? This seems like the best idea. I suspect the table just got typed in from the datasheet.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
