On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Subject: lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks > > From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:48 +0100 > > > > This patch extends lockdep to validate lock wait-type context. > > ooh, a new toy. > > *boom* >
Oh cute, I'll have to stare at slub. ISTR there's a current slub-rt patch floating about. I'd have to just blindly convert slub to raw_spinlocks (although that'll get rid of the warning) without trying to limit the lock hold time of raw_spinlocks. > nitpick: Why is the backtrace printed twice ? Because I'm an idiot, lemme fix that ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
