On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:49:21AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I saw a previous version of the code that did that, and it really
> didn't work out well -- it ended up being more complex and slower.
I suspected as much.
But, we still probably should use the generic struct insn, insn_field,
etc and act on them in mpx.c instead of defining our own mpx_insn,
mpx_insn_field, X86_MODRM_MOD, etc in the header which are more or less
copied from insn.h, right?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
