3.5.7.29 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>

commit dfe5b9ad83a63180f358b27d1018649a27b394a9 upstream.

This is a GFS2 version of Tejun's patch:
4f331f01b9c43bf001d3ffee578a97a1e0633eac
vfs: don't hold s_umount over close_bdev_exclusive() call

In this case its blkdev_put itself that is the issue and this
patch uses the same solution of dropping and retaking s_umount.

Reported-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
index b8c250f..0e690dc 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c
@@ -1292,8 +1292,18 @@ static struct dentry *gfs2_mount(struct file_system_type 
*fs_type, int flags,
        if (IS_ERR(s))
                goto error_bdev;
 
-       if (s->s_root)
+       if (s->s_root) {
+               /*
+                * s_umount nests inside bd_mutex during
+                * __invalidate_device().  blkdev_put() acquires
+                * bd_mutex and can't be called under s_umount.  Drop
+                * s_umount temporarily.  This is safe as we're
+                * holding an active reference.
+                */
+               up_write(&s->s_umount);
                blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
+               down_write(&s->s_umount);
+       }
 
        memset(&args, 0, sizeof(args));
        args.ar_quota = GFS2_QUOTA_DEFAULT;
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to