On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:36:33 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <vdavy...@parallels.com> wrote:
> When direct reclaim is executed by a process bound to a set of NUMA > nodes, we should scan only those nodes when possible, but currently we > will scan kmem from all online nodes even if the kmem shrinker is NUMA > aware. That said, binding a process to a particular NUMA node won't > prevent it from shrinking inode/dentry caches from other nodes, which is > not good. Fix this. Seems right. I worry that reducing the amount of shrinking which node-bound processes perform might affect workloads in unexpected ways. I think I'll save this one for 3.15-rc1, OK? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/