The bus_mutex needs to be taken to serialize access to a specific bus.
netlink wasn't updated when bus_mutex was added and was calling
without that lock held, and not all of the masters were holding the
bus_mutex in a search.  This was causing the ds2490 hardware to stop
responding when both netlink and /sys slaves were executing bus
commands at the same time.

Signed-off-by: David Fries <da...@fries.net>
---
This fixes existing bugs, tacking it to the end of the previous patch
series.

 drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c  |    4 +++-
 drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c |    8 ++++++--
 drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c     |   13 +++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c
index 02df3b1..b077b8b 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds1wm.c
@@ -326,13 +326,14 @@ static void ds1wm_search(void *data, struct w1_master 
*master_dev,
        unsigned slaves_found = 0;
        unsigned int pass = 0;
 
+       mutex_lock(&master_dev->bus_mutex);
        dev_dbg(&ds1wm_data->pdev->dev, "search begin\n");
        while (true) {
                ++pass;
                if (pass > 100) {
                        dev_dbg(&ds1wm_data->pdev->dev,
                                "too many attempts (100), search aborted\n");
-                       return;
+                       break;
                }
 
                mutex_lock(&master_dev->bus_mutex);
@@ -439,6 +440,7 @@ static void ds1wm_search(void *data, struct w1_master 
*master_dev,
        dev_dbg(&ds1wm_data->pdev->dev,
                "pass: %d total: %d search done ms d bit pos: %d\n", pass,
                slaves_found, ms_discrep_bit);
+       mutex_unlock(&master_dev->bus_mutex);
 }
 
 /* --------------------------------------------------------------------- */
diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
index db0bf32..7404ad30 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/ds2490.c
@@ -727,9 +727,11 @@ static void ds9490r_search(void *data, struct w1_master 
*master,
         */
        u64 buf[2*64/8];
 
+       mutex_lock(&master->bus_mutex);
+
        /* address to start searching at */
        if (ds_send_data(dev, (u8 *)&master->search_id, 8) < 0)
-               return;
+               goto search_out;
        master->search_id = 0;
 
        value = COMM_SEARCH_ACCESS | COMM_IM | COMM_RST | COMM_SM | COMM_F |
@@ -739,7 +741,7 @@ static void ds9490r_search(void *data, struct w1_master 
*master,
                search_limit = 0;
        index = search_type | (search_limit << 8);
        if (ds_send_control(dev, value, index) < 0)
-               return;
+               goto search_out;
 
        do {
                schedule_timeout(jtime);
@@ -791,6 +793,8 @@ static void ds9490r_search(void *data, struct w1_master 
*master,
                        master->max_slave_count);
                set_bit(W1_WARN_MAX_COUNT, &master->flags);
        }
+search_out:
+       mutex_unlock(&master->bus_mutex);
 }
 
 #if 0
diff --git a/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c b/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
index a5dc219..5234964 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/w1_netlink.c
@@ -246,11 +246,16 @@ static int w1_process_command_master(struct w1_master 
*dev,
 {
        int err = -EINVAL;
 
+       /* drop bus_mutex for search (does it's own locking), and add/remove
+        * which doesn't use the bus
+        */
        switch (req_cmd->cmd) {
        case W1_CMD_SEARCH:
        case W1_CMD_ALARM_SEARCH:
        case W1_CMD_LIST_SLAVES:
+               mutex_unlock(&dev->bus_mutex);
                err = w1_get_slaves(dev, req_msg, req_hdr, req_cmd);
+               mutex_lock(&dev->bus_mutex);
                break;
        case W1_CMD_READ:
        case W1_CMD_WRITE:
@@ -262,8 +267,12 @@ static int w1_process_command_master(struct w1_master *dev,
                break;
        case W1_CMD_SLAVE_ADD:
        case W1_CMD_SLAVE_REMOVE:
+               mutex_unlock(&dev->bus_mutex);
+               mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
                err = w1_process_command_addremove(dev, req_msg, req_hdr,
                        req_cmd);
+               mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
+               mutex_lock(&dev->bus_mutex);
                break;
        default:
                err = -EINVAL;
@@ -400,7 +409,7 @@ static void w1_process_cb(struct w1_master *dev, struct 
w1_async_cmd *async_cmd)
        struct w1_slave *sl = node->sl;
        struct w1_netlink_cmd *cmd = NULL;
 
-       mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+       mutex_lock(&dev->bus_mutex);
        dev->portid = node->block->portid;
        if (sl && w1_reset_select_slave(sl))
                err = -ENODEV;
@@ -437,7 +446,7 @@ static void w1_process_cb(struct w1_master *dev, struct 
w1_async_cmd *async_cmd)
        else
                atomic_dec(&dev->refcnt);
        dev->portid = 0;
-       mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
+       mutex_unlock(&dev->bus_mutex);
 
        mutex_lock(&dev->list_mutex);
        list_del(&async_cmd->async_entry);
-- 
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to