From: Eric Dumazet
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 00:23 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> > @@ -1220,7 +1219,7 @@ static unsigned int fanout_demux_hash(struct
> > packet_fanout *f,
> > struct sk_buff *skb,
> > unsigned int num)
> > {
> > - return reciprocal_divide(skb->rxhash, num);
> > + return (u32)(((u64) skb->rxhash * num) >> 32);
> > }
> >
>
> This is unfortunate.
>
> (This reverts one of your patch : f55d112e529386 )
>
> Please add a helper to explain what's going on here, and on many other
> spots we do this computation (as in get_rps_cpu()).
> Few people really understand this.
>
> Or keep reciprocal_divide() as is, and introduce a new set of functions
> for people really wanting the precise divides.
Maybe rename the current reciprocal_divide() as well?
In the above code it isn't immediately obvious that the result of
a division is as useful as that of a modulus!
OTOH the high 32 bits of a 32x32 multiply are (slightly) more obviously
in the required range.
David
