On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 01:05:21PM +0000, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> A new macro for setting/clearing bits in the SCTLR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h |   13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h 
> b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> index 5c22851..aba6458 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
> @@ -383,4 +383,17 @@ THUMB(   orr     \reg , \reg , #PSR_T_BIT        )
>  #endif
>       .endm
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> +/* Macro for setting/clearing bits in sctlr */
> +     .macro update_sctlr, set:req, clear:req, tmp:req, tmp2:req
> +     mrc     p15, 0, \tmp, c1, c0, 0
> +     ldr     \tmp2, =\set
> +     orr     \tmp, \tmp, \tmp2
> +     ldr     \tmp2, =\clear
> +     mvn     \tmp2, \tmp2
> +     and     \tmp, \tmp, \tmp2
> +     mcr     p15, 0, \tmp, c1, c0, 0

I think this would be cleaner if you force the caller to put set and clear
into registers beforehand, rather than have to do the literal load every
time. Also, I don't think set and clear should be required (and then you can
lose tmp2 as well).

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to