On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:22:22PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Despite the name mach-crag6410-module.c, the code is built for > MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410 -- which is bool, and hence this code is > either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using > module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat > misleading. > > Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from > init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd > have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that > would be a worse thing. > > Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one > of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets > mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall > directly in this change means that the runtime impact is > zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering. > > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-li...@fluff.org> > Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene....@samsung.com> > Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> > Cc: patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> > ---
Tested-by: Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
