On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:20:39 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt | 2014-01-24 15:09:33 [-0500]: > > >[ Talking with Sebastian on IRC, it seems that doing the irq_work_run() > > from the interrupt in -rt is a bad thing. Here we simply raise the > > softirq if there's irq work to do. This too boots on my i7 ] > > It is okay in general because most of the users should not run in bare > interrupt context. The only exception here is the nohz_full_kick_work > thing. > I know we discussed this on IRC, but I wanted to publicly state that the missing irq work callback was the RCU's rsp_wakeup() function. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
