On Tue 28-01-14 12:07:51, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > > 2b:* 4d 8b 64 c6 08 mov 0x8(%r14,%rax,8),%r12 <--
> > > trapping instruction
> > >
> > > R14 is 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6c03, which looks like a use-after-free.
> > Yup. But I'm somewhat puzzled by the trace. We crash when calling
> > fsnotify_destroy_event() from fanotify_handle_event(). The fsnotify code
> > has been called from do_sys_open() so the event was a 'FS_OPEN' which fails
> > the fsn_event->mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS test.
> >
> > Slapping my forehead, that's a really stupid bug. The event
> > fsnotify_add_notify_event() returns may be freed by the time we return
> > because we already dropped the notification mutex. And then fsn_event->mask
> > & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS test will pass because FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS matches
> > with the poison pattern 0x6b6b6b6b. So yet another hacked up version of
> > fanotify fix is attached. And I have to seriously think about use counts
> > for fanotify version of that struct.
>
> With the fixed version of the patch, all the fanotify-related oopses are
> gone on my system.
Thanks for testing. So now I have to come up with something mergeable :)
Honza
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
