3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> [ Upstream commit c196403b79aa241c3fefb3ee5bb328aa7c5cc860 ] commit ae4b46e9d "net: rds: use this_cpu_* per-cpu helper" broke per-cpu handling for rds. chpfirst is the result of __this_cpu_read(), so it is an absolute pointer and not __percpu. Therefore, __this_cpu_write() should not operate on chpfirst, but rather on cache->percpu->first, just like __this_cpu_read() did before. Signed-off-byd Gerald Schaefer <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- net/rds/ib_recv.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/net/rds/ib_recv.c +++ b/net/rds/ib_recv.c @@ -421,8 +421,7 @@ static void rds_ib_recv_cache_put(struct struct rds_ib_refill_cache *cache) { unsigned long flags; - struct list_head *old; - struct list_head __percpu *chpfirst; + struct list_head *old, *chpfirst; local_irq_save(flags); @@ -432,7 +431,7 @@ static void rds_ib_recv_cache_put(struct else /* put on front */ list_add_tail(new_item, chpfirst); - __this_cpu_write(chpfirst, new_item); + __this_cpu_write(cache->percpu->first, new_item); __this_cpu_inc(cache->percpu->count); if (__this_cpu_read(cache->percpu->count) < RDS_IB_RECYCLE_BATCH_COUNT) @@ -452,7 +451,7 @@ static void rds_ib_recv_cache_put(struct } while (old); - __this_cpu_write(chpfirst, NULL); + __this_cpu_write(cache->percpu->first, NULL); __this_cpu_write(cache->percpu->count, 0); end: local_irq_restore(flags); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
