On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:49:49PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> wrote:

> > I'm trying to thing of a good reason to not make PM_SLEEP depend on
> > PM_RUNTIME for platforms like this.

> Isn't the typical Android platform using PM_SLEEP without using
> PM_RUNTIME?

No, not at all.  Android does make aggressive use of sleep but it's also
highly desirable to use runtime PM - for example you don't want to have
to power up the entire SoC simply because the system is getting a new
e-mail pushed to it or location updates, most of the hardware is doing
nothing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to