El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 17:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk escribió: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:47:45 +0100, Arjan van de Ven said: > > > > > as for obsd_get_random_long().. would it be possible to use the > > > get_random_int() function from the patches I posted the other day? They > > > use the existing random.c infrastructure instead of making a copy... > > > > > > I still don't understand why you need a obsd_rand.c and can't use the > > > normal random.c > > > > Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told > > that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while > > back. > >... > > At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible. >
Yes, AFAIK :) I will try to follow Arjan's recommendations on using his functions instead of obsd ones, even if I think it should be alone in the current file. Also I will split up the patch. I will do it as soon as I get time for it, I need first to work out a cleaner vsec (no more code in headers and such) and also a sys_chroot() hook that I requested yesterday on the bugzilla, among the SELinux 2.4 backport which needs several fixes due to last 2.6 bk-commits reports. Thanks for the comments, Cheers. -- Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
