Hi Peter, > This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues > with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to > addressing the locking regression recently reported [1]. > > As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts > 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c.
so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are intended for 3.15 merge window. I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches for 3.14 at this point in time. What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense? Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
