On 11 February 2014 17:09, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Sachin Kamat <sachin.ka...@linaro.org> > wrote: >> On 11 February 2014 15:40, Laszlo Papp <lp...@kde.org> wrote: >>>>>> [snip] >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +struct max665x_dev { >>>>>>> + struct device *dev; >>>>>>> + struct mutex iolock; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + struct i2c_client *i2c; >>>>>>> + struct regmap *map; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + int type; >>>>>> >>>>>> Unnecessary extra lines above could be removed. >>>>> >>>>> I prefer it that way, but I will remove the two extra lines as you wish. >>>> >>>> As I already said, these are just nits and only since you were >>>> re-spinning the patch, >>>> I suggested them. Also, since this is a new file being added, it >>>> avoids further patches >>>> doing these same things. >>> >>> Well, it is worse in my opinion because it makes the code more bloated >>> without separation between units, but I made the requested change >>> anyway because the feature matters lotta more to me than this styling. >>> Hope it is OK now? >> >> The only thing that you missed among what you agreed to change is the >> arrangement of >> "depends on" and "select" in Kconfig. Rest look OK. Thanks for taking care. > > Ah, true. I will do that tomorrow if it is a blocker for the integration.
I don't think it is a blocker in any way and you may choose to ignore it as well. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/