3.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Li Zhong <[email protected]> commit fd120dc2e205d2318a8b47d6d8098b789e3af67d upstream. It seems that forward declaration couldn't work well with typedef, use struct spinlock directly to avoiding following build errors: In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:81, from include/linux/seqlock.h:35, from include/linux/time.h:5, from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56, from include/linux/timex.h:56, from include/linux/sched.h:17, from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17: include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t' /root/linux-next/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_ar pmd_t *pmdp); #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t; -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl, - spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl) +struct spinlock; +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl, + struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl) { /* * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
