On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 13:40 +1300, Michal Ludvig wrote: > Fruhwirth Clemens wrote: > > > Especially, if James ask me to redo Michal's conflicting patches > > (done btw), which are totally off-topic for me. > > Great, thanks! Has the interface for multiblock modules changed or > should my old modules work with it with no more effort?
Yes, changes are required. I fixed up padlock-aes.c along the way. So don't worry if it's just padlock. The changes to the CryptoAPI core minimal, in fact, 10 lines, retaining all the functionally of you original patch. I'll finalize/clean/post the patch when the scatterwalk stuff is merged. Please have a look at the scatterwalk code, because, as I don't have a padlock, you'll have the joy of running my code for the very first time :) -- Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://clemens.endorphin.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
