On February 11, 2014 4:44:42 PM EST, Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote: >On 2014-02-11 13:21, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> >> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 7:21:56 PM, you wrote: >> >>> On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>>> On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote: >>>>> >>>> That would mean that unmap_purged_grants would no longer be static >and >>>> I should also add a prototype for it in blkback/common.h, which is >kind >>>> of ugly IMHO. >> >>> But less ugly than initializing work with a NULL function, IMO. >> >>>> commit 980e72e45454b64ccb7f23b6794a769384e51038 >>>> Author: Roger Pau Monne <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Tue Feb 11 19:04:06 2014 +0100 >>>> >>>> xen-blkback: init persistent_purge_work work_struct >>>> >>>> Initialize persistent_purge_work work_struct on >xen_blkif_alloc (and >>>> remove the previous initialization done in >purge_persistent_gnt). This >>>> prevents flush_work from complaining even if >purge_persistent_gnt has >>>> not been used. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]> >> >>> Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <[email protected]> >> >> And a Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <[email protected]> > >Konrad, I was going to ship my current tree today, but looks like we >need this too.
Yes. Are you OK taking it from this thread or would you like me to prep a GIT pull with it? Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
