On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 14:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:20:47 +0200 Sougata Santra <soug...@tuxera.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Concurrent access to alloc_blocks in hfsplus_inode_info is
> > protected by extents_lock mutex. This patch fixes two
> > instances where alloc_blocks modification was not protected
> > with this lock. This fixes possible allocation bitmap
> > corruption in race conditions while extending and truncating
> > files.
> > 
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
> > @@ -498,11 +498,13 @@ int hfsplus_file_extend(struct inode *inode)
> >                     goto insert_extent;
> >     }
> >  out:
> > -   mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> >     if (!res) {
> >             hip->alloc_blocks += len;
> > +           mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> >             hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(inode, HFSPLUS_I_ALLOC_DIRTY);
> > +           return 0;
> >     }
> > +   mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> >     return res;
> >  
> 
> This looks OK.
> 
> > @@ -592,9 +594,9 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode *inode)
> >             hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
> >     }
> >     hfs_find_exit(&fd);
> > -   mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> >  
> >     hip->alloc_blocks = blk_cnt;
> > +   mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> >  out:
> >     hip->phys_size = inode->i_size;
> >     hip->fs_blocks = (inode->i_size + sb->s_blocksize - 1) >>
> 
> But this does not.  To provide locking for
> hfsplus_inode_info.alloc_blocks, we must take the lock *before* taking
> a local copy of ->alloc_blocks.
> 
> Please review:
> 
> --- a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c~hfsplus-fix-concurrent-acess-of-alloc_blocks-fix
> +++ a/fs/hfsplus/extents.c
> @@ -556,11 +556,13 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode
>  
>       blk_cnt = (inode->i_size + HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz - 1) >>
>                       HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->alloc_blksz_shift;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
> +
>       alloc_cnt = hip->alloc_blocks;
>       if (blk_cnt == alloc_cnt)
> -             goto out;
> +             goto out_unlock;
>  
> -     mutex_lock(&hip->extents_lock);
>       res = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->ext_tree, &fd);
>       if (res) {
>               mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
> @@ -594,6 +596,7 @@ void hfsplus_file_truncate(struct inode
>       hfs_find_exit(&fd);
>  
>       hip->alloc_blocks = blk_cnt;
> +out_unlock:
>       mutex_unlock(&hip->extents_lock);
>  out:
>       hip->phys_size = inode->i_size;
> _
> 
This is good, Missed it. Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to