Hi Peter.
It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip except this one.
What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do?

Thanx


On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
---
  kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c 
b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index a5457d5..0434ff1 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int write_iteration = 50;
  module_param(write_iteration, uint, 0644);
  MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, "# of writes between timestamp readings");
-static int producer_nice = 19;
-static int consumer_nice = 19;
+static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE;
+static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
static int producer_fifo = -1;
  static int consumer_fifo = -1;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
/* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */
        if (producer_fifo < 0 && consumer_fifo < 0 &&
-           producer_nice == 19 && consumer_nice == 19)
+           producer_nice == MAX_NICE && consumer_nice == MAX_NICE)
                trace_printk("WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest 
priority.\n");
trace_printk("Time: %lld (usecs)\n", time);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to