On 02/24/2014 05:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 04:39:08PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:

And when you do that; you can also push down the
current_clr_polling_and_test() muck so it doesn't cover the actual
cpuidle policy code.

I am not getting it. Where do you suggest to move it ?

A little something like so I suppose;

Thanks for taking the time to send me this patch.

only call
current_clr_polling_and_test() right before calling the actual idle
function. Although I suppose cpuidle_enter() can still do all sorts of
weird.

Well there is the polling idle state for the x86 and ppc cpuidle drivers. Except that, I think we have something more or less clean.

--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -78,37 +78,35 @@ static int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
        stop_critical_timings();
        rcu_idle_enter();

-       next_state = cpuidle_enabled(drv, dev);
-       if (next_state < 0) {
-               arch_cpu_idle();
-               goto out;
-       }
-
-       /*
-        * Ask the governor for the next state, this call can fail for
-        * different reasons: cpuidle is not enabled or an idle state
-        * fulfilling the constraints was not found. In this case, we
-        * fall back to the default idle function
-        */
-       next_state = cpuidle_select(drv, dev);
+       if (cpuidle_enabled(drv, dev) == 0) {
+               /*
+                * Ask the governor for the next state, this call can fail for
+                * different reasons: cpuidle is not enabled or an idle state
+                * fulfilling the constraints was not found. In this case, we
+                * fall back to the default idle function
+                */
+               next_state = cpuidle_select(drv, dev);
+
+               if (current_clr_polling_and_test()) {
+                       dev->last_residency = 0;
+                       entered_state = next_state;
+                       local_irq_enable();
+               } else {
+                       trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
+                       entered_state = cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state);
+                       trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
+               }

-       if (need_resched()) {

Ok. The need_resched is now replaced by 'current_clr_polling_and_test', with a call to '__current_set_polling()' to set the flag back, right ?

For my personal information, what is the subtlety with:

if (tif_need_resched())
        set_preempt_need_resched();

?

-               dev->last_residency = 0;
                /* give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome */
-               cpuidle_reflect(dev, next_state);
-               local_irq_enable();
-               goto out;
+               cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
+       } else {
+               if (current_clr_polling_and_test())
+                       local_irq_enable();
+               else
+                       arch_cpu_idle();
        }
+       __current_set_polling();

-       trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
-
-       entered_state = cpuidle_enter(drv, dev, next_state);
-
-       trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, dev->cpu);
-
-       /* give the governor an opportunity to reflect on the outcome */
-       cpuidle_reflect(dev, entered_state);
-out:
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled()))
                local_irq_enable();

@@ -145,16 +143,11 @@ static void cpu_idle_loop(void)
                         * know that the IPI is going to arrive right
                         * away
                         */
-                       if (cpu_idle_force_poll || 
tick_check_broadcast_expired()) {
+                       if (cpu_idle_force_poll || 
tick_check_broadcast_expired())
                                cpu_idle_poll();
-                       } else {
-                               if (!current_clr_polling_and_test()) {
-                                       cpuidle_idle_call();
-                               } else {
-                                       local_irq_enable();
-                               }
-                               __current_set_polling();
-                       }
+                       else
+                               cpu_idle_call();
+
                        arch_cpu_idle_exit();
                        /*
                         * We need to test and propagate the TIF_NEED_RESCHED



--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to