On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:55 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Yeah, my patch only addresses the nohz_full case, but since there > doesn't seem to be any general agreemenet about the generic case, it > seems that exposing all unbound workqueues via WQ_SYSFS is the way to > go. > > Mike, looks like you may have started on that. Did it get any further?
No, work gets in the way of tinker time. Not sure which way I want to explore anyway. On the one hand, auto-quiesce thingy tied to domain construction/destruction sounds good, but on the other, just handing control to the user is highly attractive.. likely lots simpler too. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
