On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 02:45:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/24/2014 10:01 PM, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> >Pentium M is PAE capable but does not indicate so in the CPUID response.
> >This is an issue now that some distributions are no longer shipping
> >non-PAE kernels (those distributions no longer boot on Pentium M). This
> >small patch fixes the issue by forcing the PAE capability on Pentium M.
> >
> >For more discussion see https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+bug/930447
> >
>
> 1. This patch doesn't match the discussion in the link.
> 2. You would have to also enable this in the cpu testing code in
> arch/x86/boot.
> 3. At the very least we need to print a serious warning that the CPU
> is being run outside its specifications. I have no personal
> information about why this CPUID bit was disabled, but it could be
> that it was discovered in testing that it didn't work correctly in
> all circumstances (e.g. high temperature.) This is very much "use
> at your own risk..."; you could get data corruption or even
> hardware damage.
>
> We should probably also taint the kernel.
Right, I was about to say that. And since there's no special bit for
running "out-of-spec", we could probably repurpose
TAINT_UNSAFE_SMP - 'S' - SMP with CPUs not designed for SMP.
to
TAINT_UNSAFE_OUT_OF_SPEC (the letter S fits still) and add that taint
everytime we're enforcing functionality against doctor's orders, so to
speak. :-)
Hmm.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
