On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:59:22 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:12:38 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>>29_ide_explicit_TASKFILE_NO_DATA.patch
> >>>
> >>> Make data_phase explicit in NO_DATA cases.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>Index: linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
> >>===================================================================
> >>--- linux-ide-export.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02
> >>10:28:07.852771465 +0900
> >>+++ linux-ide-export/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2005-02-02
> >>10:28:08.121727827 +0900
> >>@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static unsigned long idedisk_read_native
> >> args.tfRegister[IDE_SELECT_OFFSET] = 0x40;
> >> args.tfRegister[IDE_COMMAND_OFFSET] = WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX;
> >> args.command_type = IDE_DRIVE_TASK_NO_DATA;
> >>+ args.data_phase = TASKFILE_NO_DATA;
> >> args.handler = &task_no_data_intr;
> >
> >
> > Could you add small helper to ide.h for doing this?
> >
> > static inline void ide_prep_no_data_cmd(ide_task_t *task)
> > {
> > task->command_type = IDE_DRIVE_TASK_NO_DATA;
> > task->data_phase = TASKFILE_NO_DATA;
> > task->handler = &task_no_data_intr;
> > }
>
> I am thinking about removing task->handler initialization. Such that it
> defaults to task_no_data_intr if data_phase == TASKFILE_NO_DATA and so
> on for all other data_phases. Currently, the same information is
> specified repeatedly. What do you think?
Please do it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
