Hi Peter, On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:50:43 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:35:19PM +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > > > > while testing next-20140226 I got an issue with the function > > wait_event_timeout. When this function timed out instead of returning > > 0, it returned the value of the timeout passed in parameter. I found > > that reverting "sched/wait: Suppress Sparse 'variable shadowing' > > warning" fixed this regression. > > > > I got this issue in the driver drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c. > > Ah indeed. We actually rely on the shadowing for ___wait_cond_timeout(). > > We further used the __ret variable in __wait_event_timeout()'s cmd > argument: __ret = schedule_timeout(__ret). That now explicitly uses the > wrong __ret. > > Yeah, we need to pull that patch.
I have reverted that commit from linux-next for today pending some other resolution. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
pgpnT4SzjFsOC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
