Hi Mike,
On 27/02/2014 01:42, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Jean-Jacques Hiblot (2014-02-05 00:37:36)
From: Boris BREZILLON <[email protected]>
System clks are just gates, and thus do not provide any rate operations.
Authorize clk rate change to be propagated to system clk parents.
Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
index 8f7c043..a98557b 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-system.c
@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ at91_clk_register_system(struct at91_pmc *pmc, const char
*name,
* (see drivers/memory) which would request and enable the ddrck clock.
* When this is done we will be able to remove CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag.
*/
- init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
+ init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_GATE | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
Just wanted to do a quick sanity check here. Do you really need
CLK_SET_RATE_GATE?
After taking a closer look, I'd say I don't need this flag, because it's
already set on programmable clks, am I right ?
Do you want me to send a new version removing this flag ?
Otherwise these patches look fine.
Regards,
Mike
+ CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED;
sys->id = id;
sys->hw.init = &init;
--
1.8.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
