On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:55:38 +0900, Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 12_ide_hwgroup_t_polling.patch > > > > ide_hwgroup_t.polling field added. 0 in poll_timeout field > > used to indicate inactive polling but because 0 is a valid > > jiffy value, though slim, there's a chance that something > > weird can happen.
Is there really a possibility of something weird? I'm not claiming that I like this way of coding but poll_timeout is assigned either to '0' or to 'jiffies + WAIT_WORSTCASE'. Bartlomiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/