This intermediate patch revamps the vclock_gettime.c by moving some functions
around. It is only for spliting purpose, to make whole the 32 bit vdso timer
patch easier to review.

Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stef...@seibold.net>
---
 arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
index eb5d7a5..bbc8065 100644
--- a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -26,41 +26,26 @@
 
 #define gtod (&VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data))
 
-notrace static cycle_t vread_tsc(void)
+static notrace cycle_t vread_hpet(void)
 {
-       cycle_t ret;
-       u64 last;
-
-       /*
-        * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU)
-        * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered
-        * with respect to loads.  The various CPU manuals are unclear
-        * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads,
-        * but no one has ever seen it happen.
-        */
-       rdtsc_barrier();
-       ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles();
-
-       last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last;
-
-       if (likely(ret >= last))
-               return ret;
+       return readl((const void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_HPET) + 
HPET_COUNTER);
+}
 
-       /*
-        * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely
-        * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is
-        * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC
-        * to generate a branch instead.  I don't barrier() because
-        * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function
-        * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code.
-        */
-       asm volatile ("");
-       return last;
+notrace static long vdso_fallback_gettime(long clock, struct timespec *ts)
+{
+       long ret;
+       asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
+           "0" (__NR_clock_gettime), "D" (clock), "S" (ts) : "memory");
+       return ret;
 }
 
-static notrace cycle_t vread_hpet(void)
+notrace static long vdso_fallback_gtod(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
 {
-       return readl((const void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_HPET) + 
HPET_COUNTER);
+       long ret;
+
+       asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
+           "0" (__NR_gettimeofday), "D" (tv), "S" (tz) : "memory");
+       return ret;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
@@ -133,23 +118,37 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
 }
 #endif
 
-notrace static long vdso_fallback_gettime(long clock, struct timespec *ts)
+notrace static cycle_t vread_tsc(void)
 {
-       long ret;
-       asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
-           "0" (__NR_clock_gettime),"D" (clock), "S" (ts) : "memory");
-       return ret;
-}
+       cycle_t ret;
+       u64 last;
 
-notrace static long vdso_fallback_gtod(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
-{
-       long ret;
+       /*
+        * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU)
+        * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered
+        * with respect to loads.  The various CPU manuals are unclear
+        * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads,
+        * but no one has ever seen it happen.
+        */
+       rdtsc_barrier();
+       ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles();
 
-       asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
-           "0" (__NR_gettimeofday), "D" (tv), "S" (tz) : "memory");
-       return ret;
-}
+       last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last;
 
+       if (likely(ret >= last))
+               return ret;
+
+       /*
+        * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely
+        * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is
+        * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC
+        * to generate a branch instead.  I don't barrier() because
+        * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function
+        * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code.
+        */
+       asm volatile ("");
+       return last;
+}
 
 notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode)
 {
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to