On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:26:36PM -0500, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Introduce
> 
>   $ perf kvm --list-cmds
> 
> to dump a raw list of commands for use by the completion script. In
> order to do this, introduce parse_options_subcommand() for handling
> subcommands as a special case in the parse-options machinery.

so this doesn't change the behaviour at all, right?

SNIP

>  
> -     argc = parse_options(argc, argv, kvm_options, kvm_usage,
> -                     PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> +     argc = parse_options_subcommand(argc, argv, kvm_options, 
> kvm_subcommands, kvm_usage,
> +                                     PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
>       if (!argc)
>               usage_with_options(kvm_usage, kvm_options);
>  
> diff --git a/tools/perf/perf-completion.sh b/tools/perf/perf-completion.sh
> index 496e2ab..ae3a576 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/perf-completion.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/perf-completion.sh
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ __perf_main ()
>               __perfcomp_colon "$evts" "$cur"
>       # List subcommands for 'perf kvm'
>       elif [[ $prev == "kvm" ]]; then
> -             subcmds="top record report diff buildid-list stat"
> +             subcmds=$($cmd $prev --list-cmds)

Do we want some generic approach here.. if we're
adding generic --list-cmds option anyway.. hm?

SNIP

> -int parse_options(int argc, const char **argv, const struct option *options,
> -               const char * const usagestr[], int flags)
> +int parse_options_subcommand(int argc, const char **argv, const struct 
> option *options,
> +                     const char *const subcommands[], const char 
> *usagestr[], int flags)
>  {
>       struct parse_opt_ctx_t ctx;
>  
>       perf_header__set_cmdline(argc, argv);
>  
> +     /* build usage string if it's not provided */
> +     if (subcommands && !usagestr[0]) {
> +             struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +             strbuf_addf(&buf, "perf %s [<options>] {", argv[0]);
> +             for (int i = 0; subcommands[i]; i++) {
> +                     if (i)
> +                             strbuf_addstr(&buf, "|");
> +                     strbuf_addstr(&buf, subcommands[i]);
> +             }
> +             strbuf_addstr(&buf, "}");
> +
> +             usagestr[0] = strdup(buf.buf);
> +             strbuf_release(&buf);
> +     }

is above code ever used now?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to