3.11.10.6 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me 
know.

------------------

From: Yifan Zhang <[email protected]>

commit 97a644208d1a08b7104d1fe2ace8cef011222711 upstream.

The ARM SMMU driver's population of puds and pmds is broken, since we
iterate over the next level of table repeatedly setting the current
level descriptor to point at the pmd being initialised. This is clearly
wrong when dealing with multiple pmds/puds.

This patch fixes the problem by moving the pud/pmd population out of the
loop and instead performing it when we allocate the next level (like we
correctly do for ptes already). The starting address for the next level
is then calculated prior to entering the loop.

Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 320894b..896a229 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -1293,6 +1293,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_alloc_init_pmd(struct 
arm_smmu_device *smmu, pud_t *pud,
                pmd = pmd_alloc_one(NULL, addr);
                if (!pmd)
                        return -ENOMEM;
+
+               pud_populate(NULL, pud, pmd);
+               arm_smmu_flush_pgtable(smmu, pud, sizeof(*pud));
+
+               pmd += pmd_index(addr);
        } else
 #endif
                pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
@@ -1301,8 +1306,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_alloc_init_pmd(struct arm_smmu_device 
*smmu, pud_t *pud,
                next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
                ret = arm_smmu_alloc_init_pte(smmu, pmd, addr, end, pfn,
                                              flags, stage);
-               pud_populate(NULL, pud, pmd);
-               arm_smmu_flush_pgtable(smmu, pud, sizeof(*pud));
                phys += next - addr;
        } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr < end);
 
@@ -1322,6 +1325,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_alloc_init_pud(struct 
arm_smmu_device *smmu, pgd_t *pgd,
                pud = pud_alloc_one(NULL, addr);
                if (!pud)
                        return -ENOMEM;
+
+               pgd_populate(NULL, pgd, pud);
+               arm_smmu_flush_pgtable(smmu, pgd, sizeof(*pgd));
+
+               pud += pud_index(addr);
        } else
 #endif
                pud = pud_offset(pgd, addr);
@@ -1330,8 +1338,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_alloc_init_pud(struct arm_smmu_device 
*smmu, pgd_t *pgd,
                next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
                ret = arm_smmu_alloc_init_pmd(smmu, pud, addr, next, phys,
                                              flags, stage);
-               pgd_populate(NULL, pud, pgd);
-               arm_smmu_flush_pgtable(smmu, pgd, sizeof(*pgd));
                phys += next - addr;
        } while (pud++, addr = next, addr < end);
 
-- 
1.9.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to