On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelg...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Yinghai Lu <ying...@kernel.org> wrote: >> how about replacing that with: >> >> if (avail.start > avail.end) >> continue; >> >> so we do not need to go deep into allocate_resource() > > We could, but why bother? This isn't a performance path, so there's > no need to add more code to optimize it. Adding code means there's > more for human readers to look at and understand, so I prefer not to > add it unless it's needed.
oh, i did not look further, if the code path could handle strange constraints properly. like min > max. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
