On 13 March 2014 11:22, Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:12:02AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:45:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 01:42:51PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> > > On 13 February 2014 18:06, Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> > > > This patch hooks in the perf_regs and libunwind code for ARM64.
>> > > > The tools/perf/arch/arm64 is created; it contains the arch specific
>> > > > code for DWARF unwinding.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pi...@linaro.org>
>> > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
>> > >
>> > > Ping on this patch. Can this one go into the perf tree?
>> >
>> > I'm happy to take it as well if there are no objections from the perf
>> > maintainers.
>>
>> I object :) Last time I took a patch for perf tools (via the arm tree) it
>> ended in a conflict from hell and we vowed not to take tools patches via
>> arch trees again.
>
> Works for me ;)
Ok thanks!

Arnaldo, can you take this patch in your tree?

Jean

>
> --
> Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to