On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:16:37PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:

SNIP

> +     event->fork.ptid = tgid;
> +     event->fork.pid  = tgid;
> +     event->fork.tid  = pid;
> +     event->fork.header.type = PERF_RECORD_FORK;
> +
> +     event->fork.header.size = (sizeof(event->fork) + machine->id_hdr_size);
> +
> +     if (process(tool, event, &synth_sample, machine) != 0)
> +             return -1;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  int perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events(struct perf_tool *tool,
>                                      union perf_event *event,
>                                      pid_t pid, pid_t tgid,
> @@ -287,6 +309,11 @@ static int __event__synthesize_thread(union perf_event 
> *comm_event,
>       DIR *tasks;
>       struct dirent dirent, *next;
>       pid_t tgid;
> +     union perf_event *fork_event;
> +
> +     fork_event = malloc(sizeof(fork_event->fork) + machine->id_hdr_size);
> +     if (fork_event == NULL)
> +             return -1;

need to be freed

maybe we could move the allocation one level up,
same as for mmap_event and comm_event

otherwise I think the logic with FORK event is correct

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to