On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > the bigger problem is however that you're once again fixing the > > symptoms, instead of the underlying problem - not the correct > > approach/mindset. > > i'll change my approach/mindset when it is proven that "the underlying > problem" can be solved. (in a deterministic fashion)
I know neither exec-shield nor PaX and therefore have no bias or preference - I thought I should chirp in on your comment here Ingo... ... > PaX cannot be a 'little bit pregnant'. (you might argue that exec-shield > is in the 6th month, but that does not change the fundamental > end-result: a child will be born ;-) Yes and no. I would think that the chances of a child being born are greater if the pregnancy has lasted successfully up until the 6th month, compared to a first week pregnancy. I assume you get my point :) -- / jakob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/