Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 02:35 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc3/2.6.11-rc3-mm2/ > > > > > > - Added the mlock and !SCHED_OTHER Linux Security Module for the audio guys. > > It seems that nothing else is going to come along and this is completely > > encapsulated. > > > > - Various other stuff. If anyone has a patch in here which they think > > should be in 2.6.11, please let me know. I'm intending to merge the > > following into 2.6.11: > > > > alpha-add-missing-dma_mapping_error.patch > > fix-compat-shmget-overflow.patch > > fix-shmget-for-ppc64-s390-64-sparc64.patch > > binfmt_elf-clearing-bss-may-fail.patch > > qlogic-warning-fixes.patch > > oprofile-exittext-referenced-in-inittext.patch > > force-read-implies-exec-for-all-32bit-processes-in-x86-64.patch > > oprofile-arm-xscale1-pmu-support-fix.patch > > Without the aty128fb and radeonfb updates, current 2.6.11 is a > regression on pmac as it breaks sleep support on previously working > laptops.
Is that worse than the risk of the large patch? > If you don't intend to get at least > try_to_acquire_console_sem() and aty128fb fix in, in which case i can > send you a minimal radeonfb patch, then I'll have to make another patch > for 2.6.11 that reverts some of the arch changes to re-enable sleep on > those machines. Ho hum. PM and fbdev are regularly broken anyway. Please always identify the patches by name - it helps avoid mistakes. These? add-try_acquire_console_sem.patch update-aty128fb-sleep-wakeup-code-for-new-powermac-changes.patch radeonfb-update.patch radeonfb-build-fix.patch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
