On 20/03/2014 12:45 πμ, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:33:00 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
>> Remove 3 sets of unnecessary braces
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <strat...@semaphore.gr>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 ++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> index 1eafd8c..ca3c01f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
>> @@ -1325,17 +1325,16 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct 
>> device *dev,
>>      cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
>>      up_read(&policy->rwsem);
>>  
>> -    if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
>> +    if (cpu != policy->cpu)
>>              sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
>> -    } else if (cpus > 1) {
> 
> These braces aren't in fact unnecessary, they are in accordance with 
> CodingStyle.
> 
>> +    else if (cpus > 1) {
>>              new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
>>              if (new_cpu >= 0) {
>>                      update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
>>  
>> -                    if (!cpufreq_suspended) {
>> +                    if (!cpufreq_suspended)
>>                              pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d 
>> from: %d\n",
>>                                       __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
>> -                    }
>>              }
>>      }
>>  
>> @@ -2158,11 +2157,9 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
>>              if (!policy->cur) {
>>                      pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq\n");
>>                      policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
>> -            } else {
>> -                    if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
>> +            } else if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
> 
> And here too.
> 
>>                              cpufreq_out_of_sync(cpu, policy->cur,
>>                                                              new_policy.cur);
>> -            }
>>      }
>>  
>>      ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
>>
> 

I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I read again the CodingStyle (more carefully 
:) ).
I'm sending the corrected patch with the single case of unnecessary braces.

Thanks,
Stratos

------------------------8<-----------------------
Remove unnecessary braces from a single statement.

Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <strat...@semaphore.gr>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e3aa9de..220c4a9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1330,10 +1330,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device 
*dev,
                if (new_cpu >= 0) {
                        update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
 
-                       if (!cpufreq_suspended) {
+                       if (!cpufreq_suspended)
                                pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d 
from: %d\n",
                                         __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
-                       }
                }
        }
 
-- 
1.8.5.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to