Hi Alessandro, Just over a week ago I sent a patch for the rtc: da9063: RTC driver file that added RTC support for the DA9063 currently in the kernel.
I'm not sure if it may have been missed in your inbox https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/11/230 The RTC patch was previously Acked by you here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112 On 11 March 2014 12:27, Lee Jones wrote: >Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH V1 2/2] rtc: da9063: RTC driver >> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com> >> >> Add the RTC driver for DA9063. >> >> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensou...@diasemi.com> >> Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zu...@towertech.it> >> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > >How could I have Acked a patch that I've never seen? > ><snip> > >> The original patch is here: >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/6/346 >> >> This patch resend is identical to the original patch, except it adds >> the Acked-by: line from Alessandro Zummo, previously provided here: >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/7/112 >> >> Also, it adds an Acked-by line on behalf of Lee Jones, as requested: >> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/369 > >Ah, no. I meant send the set with my Ack applied to the patch I >actually reviewed. > >Alessandro, > Are you happy for me to take this set through the MFD tree and send > you a pull-request for an immutable branch? > I believe that I made a mess of the resend and Ack'ed when I shouldn't have on Lee Jones's behalf -- but then there was a reply from Lee who suggested that he could take the patch through despite this. I think that was his intention. (Lee: I hope I am not stepping outside the line again!) If you have time to quickly take another look at this, then I would appreciate that. Thank you, Steve N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a��� 0��h���i