On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 25/03/14 11:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:25:42PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM64. > >>>> Necessary duplication of paravirt.h and paravirt.c with ARM. > >>>> > >>>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no > >>>> runtime pvops patching needed. > >>>> > >>>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen > >>>> ticks accounting. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]> > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>>> CC: [email protected] > >>> > >>> Catalin, Will, are you happy with this patch for 3.15? > >> > >> It's pretty small and looks fine to me. However, I would like someone > >> with more virtualisation experience than me to ack it (e.g. Marc Z). > > > > Ping? Marc, could you please give it a review? > > Yup, that looks OK to me. It's a generic feature anyway, so I don't see > any harm in enabling it for Xen. We may also use it for KVM at some point. > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
